<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO Moves Blog - Search Engine Optimisation &#187; Yahoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/category/yahoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 01:40:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bing vs. Google vs. Yahoo &#8211; SEO on the Big 3</title>
		<link>http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/2010/04/bing-vs-google-vs-yahoo-seo-on-the-big-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/2010/04/bing-vs-google-vs-yahoo-seo-on-the-big-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 04:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seomoves.org/blog/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s not a whole lot of difference between what you do for SEO on Yahoo! versus SEO for Bing and Google. In all cases, fresh, relevant content, high quality inbound links, and judicious use of keywords will do the most good. But the good news is, you don&#8217;t have to sacrifice SEO best practices for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- 		@page { margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } -->There&#8217;s not a whole lot of difference between what you do for SEO on Yahoo! versus SEO for Bing and Google. In all cases, fresh, relevant content, high quality inbound links, and judicious use of keywords will do the most good. But the good news is, you don&#8217;t have to sacrifice SEO best practices for one search engine to do well in another. In other words, engines don&#8217;t penalize for practices that other engines endorse.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-132" title="bing vs google vs yahoo" src="http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/bing-goog-yahoo.png" alt="bing vs google vs yahoo" width="220" height="154" />The big don&#8217;ts are the same for all three of the major search engines. They all frown upon things like keyword stuffing, paid link schemes, and sites that are thin on content but thick with affiliate links. Stay away from these things, and all three of the major search engines will reward you for it. Yahoo! and Bing tend to place a little more emphasis on the age of your site than Google does, but in every case, being an older, more established site is an asset and not a liability.</p>
<p>Fortunately, you don&#8217;t have to apply SEO to your site with your Yahoo! hat on, then with your Bing hat, then with your Google hat. Best practices for SEO work for all three, and if there are smaller tweaks you want to employ to make your site more palatable to Bing or Yahoo! there&#8217;s no reason not to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/2010/04/bing-vs-google-vs-yahoo-seo-on-the-big-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

