<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO Moves Blog - Search Engine Optimisation &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 07:24:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Since Yahoo SERP&#039;s are going to be powered by BING soon should we bother to optimize for it?</title>
		<link>http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/2010/02/since-yahoo-serps-are-going-to-be-powered-by-bing-soon-should-we-bother-to-optimize-for-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/2010/02/since-yahoo-serps-are-going-to-be-powered-by-bing-soon-should-we-bother-to-optimize-for-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seomoves.org/blog/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like the rest of the web, Google&#8217;s marketing strategies and tools are constantly evolving. Does this mean the death of affiliate marketing on Google (as in the screen shot), or, as some have speculated, the death of &#8220;thin affiliates&#8221; on Google? Thin affiliates are sites that build a site or platform around affiliate programs. For [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- 		@page { margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } -->Like the rest of the web, Google&#8217;s marketing strategies and tools are constantly evolving. Does this mean the death of affiliate marketing on Google (as in the screen shot), or, as some have speculated, the death of &#8220;thin affiliates&#8221; on Google? Thin affiliates are sites that build a site or platform around affiliate programs. For example, a thin affiliate might find an affiliate program for teeth whitening kits and then build a site about cosmetic dentistry around it, hoping to drive traffic to the affiliate site in order to get commissions.</p>
<p>Actually, the death of thin affiliates has been declared multiple times, and perhaps there&#8217;s something to it, but like the &#8220;corpse&#8221; in Monty Python&#8217;s &#8220;Bring Out Your Dead&#8221; sketch, thin affiliates say they&#8217;re doing fine, thanks.</p>
<p>However, in early January 2010 Google slashed the number of advertisers in some categories by 90%, clearing the way for those who create original products and original content. And that&#8217;s what it eventually comes down to, even for thin affiliates that make quick fortunes slinging affiliate sites all over the place: if you don&#8217;t have unique content, you&#8217;ll be roadkill on the information superhighway eventually.</p>
<p>The way to long term marketing success with Google has always theoretically been high quality original content, it&#8217;s just that now they&#8217;re backing up their words with some slash and burn tactics that make thin affiliates a shorter term proposition for most.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/2010/02/since-yahoo-serps-are-going-to-be-powered-by-bing-soon-should-we-bother-to-optimize-for-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monitor Site Performance by Using Google&#8217;s Webmaster Tools</title>
		<link>http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/2010/01/monitor-site-performance-by-using-googles-webmaster-tools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/2010/01/monitor-site-performance-by-using-googles-webmaster-tools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s Webmaster Tools allows you to monitor your site&#8217;s performance over time. &#8220;Performance&#8221; has to do with how quickly your website loads. It is calculated based on the most frequently accessed pages by people who use the Google Toolbar and have PageRank activated. This allows Google to reflect real load times for real users. For [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- 		@page { margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } --><a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/">Google&#8217;s Webmaster Tools</a> allows you to monitor your site&#8217;s performance over time. &#8220;Performance&#8221; has to do with how quickly your website loads. It is calculated based on the most frequently accessed pages by people who use the Google Toolbar and have PageRank activated. This allows Google to reflect real load times for real users. For example, if the majority of your visitors use high-speed broadband, the data will reflect these numbers rather than the numbers from people who get on your site with dial-up.</p>
<p>The first screenshot, from the Google Webmaster Central Blog, shows load time on the y-axis and time on the x-axis. The dotted line shows the 20th percentile value across all sites. It is what Google uses to separate the fast from the slow sites. The second screen shot, from the same blog, shows example pages and load times. The third screen shot shows helpful suggestions for getting your page to load faster.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/site-performance-1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-18" title="site performance graph" src="http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/site-performance-1.jpg" alt="site performance graph" width="460" height="142" /></a></p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-19" title="site performance load times" src="http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/site-performance-2.jpg" alt="site performance load times" width="589" height="246" /></p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-20" title="site performance suggestions" src="http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/site-performance-3.jpg" alt="site performance suggestions" width="514" height="234" /></p>
<p>It is important for you to know that at the time of this writing, Google site performance (speed) data does not affect your search engine ranking in any way. That could, of course, change eventually, but right now page load speed does not affect search engine ranking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/2010/01/monitor-site-performance-by-using-googles-webmaster-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>URL Structure on a Page</title>
		<link>http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/2010/01/url-structure-on-a-page/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/2010/01/url-structure-on-a-page/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 07:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domains and URLs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keywords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seomoves.org/blog/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your web pages&#8217; URL structure, or simply, their web address, is important for search engine ranking purposes. It isn&#8217;t the most important thing, and it isn&#8217;t irrelevant, either. Your pages&#8217; URL structures can be made so that they help your rankings rather than just sitting there and doing nothing but being an address. Should you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- 		@page { margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } -->Your web pages&#8217; URL structure, or simply, their web address, is important for search engine ranking purposes. It isn&#8217;t <em>the</em> most important thing, and it isn&#8217;t irrelevant, either. Your pages&#8217; URL structures can be made so that they help your rankings rather than just sitting there and doing nothing but being an address.</p>
<p>Should you have keywords in your URL structure? Yes. It won&#8217;t hurt and can only help. Consider your URL structure as an important part of a user-oriented design. Your URL structure is a key part of the usability of your site. Your site&#8217;s information architecture is how the information is grouped and categorized on a site. If you start out with a logical architecture covering your home page and all the pages within, your site will be easier to navigate for human readers and for search engine crawlers.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s common sense. If your page on, say, the Louis Vuitton Keepall 55 carry-on luggage has a URL structure like <strong>&#8220;http://www.yoursitename.com/designer goods/luggage/carry-on-luggage/Louis-Vuitton-Keepall-55&#8243; </strong>it is easy for users and search bots to figure out what that page is all about because you&#8217;ve described it in ever-increasing detail as you progress from the home page to the specific page.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-71" title="URL structure on a page" src="http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/url-structure-on-a-page.jpg" alt="" width="608" height="224" /></p>
<p>However, keep in mind that search engines are limited in the number of characters in a URL that they&#8217;ll crawl. Shorter URLs that don&#8217;t look like dynamic URLS (which are full of special characters and hard to remember) and that are shorter and to the point are a great investment in the future of your site&#8217;s search engine ranking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seomoves.co.uk/blog/2010/01/url-structure-on-a-page/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
